Ken Shamrock vs Elvis Sinosic, two awful fighters but in a bout between them ¿who would win?

I just can't decide myself, this two fighters are the worst, maybe Ken has some history but still i'm counting the present day, and his three straight humiliating losses against Ortiz retired him, Sinosic is a bad bad fighter, in all these years he hasn't improve his fight game, he almost always gets knocked out, so i was wondering, between this two bad fighters in a bout, ¿who would win?

Ken Shamrock vs Elvis Sinosic, two awful fighters but in a bout between them ¿who would win?
i hate to say it, but i think even Shamrock can beat the crap out of Sinosic. Some one in the UFC, I think Joe Rogan, described Elvis as, "A great guy with the disposition of a preacher. Unfortunately, he also hits like one." Shamrock is a dirty, mean guy and even though i think he's washed up, he's washed up because of age and lack of being able to keep up with the ever evolving MMA. Sinosic, is a guy that got to the UFC, but hasn't been able to do a single thing. It would be a fight between a "has been" and a "never was."
Reply:shamrock
Reply:ken would be pounding on him and then get sloppy and sinosic would get a armbar and win by submission
Reply:Pretty much what Jas said. Has been vs Never was.





Sinosic was never a good fighter. 8-10-2 isn't exactly the type of record you can be proud of. The King of Suck and Crumble (hehe) would fall again against Shamrock. Ken hasn't evolved very well but his submission skills are more than enough to stop Elvis. But I'd probably use this fight to take a dump anyway.





Nah I'd still watch it. I try hard to never miss a fight.
Reply:Shamrock.....in a decision