Who would win--Undertaker vs Ken Shamrock in a UFC match?

Here's the funny thing many people don;t know about the Undertaker, the fact that he has trained in martial art submissions and is an avid bixing fan and loves to do strikes, ken shamrock is not as good as he was 13 years ago. Maybe the Undertaker could take him out

Who would win--Undertaker vs Ken Shamrock in a UFC match?
Are you kidding? Shamrock would stretch him in a hart beat!
Reply:Shamrock is a MMA Undetaker is just a boxer so I think Shamrock cause he can do more then punch.
Reply:That is a tough one. I like Shamrock and Taker's my favorite. Taker does study in Ultimate Fighting and he has the height and weight advantage however Ken Shamrock was actually in UFC so the winner would be Ken Shamrock in a split decision.
Reply:Shamrock. He's a shoot fighter, The Undertaker isn't.
Reply:Taker's superior size %26amp; strength %26amp; his own boxing ability would still be enough to take out Shamrock.
Reply:Shamrock.
Reply:I would have to lean towards the best Pure Striker in the game with those "soupbones". The Undertaker.
Reply:If its a UFC match, Shamrock would win.
Reply:Ken Shamrock
Reply:Ken Shamrock
Reply:Shamrock.....he is skilled at the UFC match and Taker isn't.
Reply:Ken :)
Reply:Ken Shamrock would win.
Reply:Ken Shamrock
Reply:Undertaker period.
Reply:It would have to be Shamrock winning at his own game!
Reply:Undertaker.





Because He Is A Great Striker And In 2003 The Burried Alive Match He Bloodied Vinces Face It was Half Fake And Real He Broke His Nose and Bloodied His Face so Much...
Reply:That would be pretty interesting bout to tell you the truth..


I do believe that Taker's size and mind can make the difference...Taker wins...
Reply:The Undertaker.
Reply:Ken Shamrock
Reply:shamrock