Friday, May 21, 2010

Matt Hamel won/ remember shamrock/ortiz?

Remember when shamrock though that the ref stopped part 2 to quick and not more that a couple weeks later we saw part 3





and we all new that shamrock didn't deserve that but he got it


hamile deserves his

Matt Hamel won/ remember shamrock/ortiz?
Yeah I agree with you, we better get Bisping vs. Hamill 2.
Reply:Comparing that fight to Tito-Sham?





Shamrock is exactly that, a Sham. He is probably the most overrated person to ever step into the UFC, since he first lost to Royce Gracie.





Sham should have stayed in Professional Wrestling, because in MMA he is nothing but a bully and a puss when he bully you.
Reply:I agree that there needs to be a rematch, preferably on US soil. I'm getting tired of seeing Bisping fighting in his home town all the time, no other fighter gets to do that.





As far as the decision, this has happened before. A judge "accidentally" wrote the wrong name on the scorecard, and the decision was reversed, maybe that's what happened this time. I can't remember who the fighters were. If this is the final decision, it is the biggest load of bull that I've ever seen in the UFC. I could support the decision if one of the rounds were close, but they weren't. Hamill dominated the first two rounds, then gassed and Bisping dominated the third. That gives me a score of 29-28 for Hamill.
Reply:Matt won that fight. I haven't found one person on any site to say that he didn't.





This was definitely fixed and it changed my view of things a lot. Thank God I don't pay for these things!





I just am waiting for a rematch in the states. I can't wait for Bisping to know what people with actual vision and brains thought of that last fight!
Reply:ortiz/shamrock 2 wasnt stopped to early, blocking elbows with your face is not intelligently defending oneself!!!


but yes hammill/bisping 2 needs to happen
Reply:Hamel won the fight. Hamel controlled the fight, too bad he didn't pound the snot out of Bisping when he had him on the ground. Joe Rogan is fairly good at calling fights as he sees them, but I was disappointed at the lack of any comment. Is the UFC telling these guys that they can't be controversial when they don't agree with a decision. With the decision being so farcical and with the lack of any comment from Rogan, the UFC and Rogan just lost a lot of credibility. At the end of the fight, Bisping knew he lost, the look on his face said everything. Credit to the hometown fans in London who BOOED the decision.
Reply:That was such an upset to see Hamil loose!!! He deserves a 2nd fight to prove he should win! Matt came out ready to fight, and Bisping only ran away the entire match!


Made us all think twice about the judging of the UFC.... I feel it's just all set up....
Reply:Matt didn't only win he dominated Michael "no class" Bisping. The nerve of Bisping after the fight in the ring to tell Matt to "go back to wrestling" .. as if he really thought he won???? Are you kidding me, he jumped for joy like a little kid at xmas when they announced the totally ridiculous decision. Bisping knew the judges gave him a gift and acted accordingly, surprised! Micheal, you got your butt kicked, you lost every round and everyone watching knows it. Why do you think Rogan said you need to go back to 185 lbs?? because he knows it too.
Reply:they suck





period
Reply:It possible but it would take much more work in my view as you would have to review all three judges to see they judged correctly, how you really do that is between me as people vote differently but still Matt Hamill should of won no doubt.





It will most likely be swept under the rug and rarely bought up. As it is a clear embassment to the UFC and the judging of the game in general.


No comments:

Post a Comment